Purpose |
• The evaluation aims to compare science and technology innovation capacity between OECD countries by developing evaluation model, thereby accurately diagnosing and monitoring national status in terms of its science and technology innovation capacity. • The results of evaluation help to define Korea's strengths and weaknesses in its science and technology innovation capacity and suggest a proper policy direction needed for the enhancement of science and technology. |
---|---|
Science & technology innovation capacity |
• Science & technology innovation capacity is an ability that a nation produces economically and socially valuable results as final output through the innovation and enhancement of science and technology. National innovative capacity is the ability of a country – as both a political and economic entity – to produce and commercialize a flow of innovative technology over the long term(Porter & Scott Stern, 2001). |
Progress so far |
• The first research was initiated to develop indicators measuring a nation's innovation capacity(2004). • The evaluation model composed of five dimensions (resources, activities, network, environment, and performance) were designed. A pilot analysis and time series comparison of science and technology innovation capacity from 1988 to 2002 was conducted for eleven countries(2005). • The COSTII (COmposite Science and Technology Innovation Index) was finally developed and the evaluation of science and technology innovation capacity for 30 OECD countries started in 2006. The results have been reported to the National Science and Technology Council. ※ Based on Article 23 of “the Act on Performance Evaluation and Management of National Research and Development Projects, etc.” (Evaluation of Capabilities to Innovate Science and Technology) • When COSTII arrived at the fifth year of development in 2010, the evaluation methodology and 31 indicators were reviewed and revised comprehensively to examine its development methodologies and need of indicator adjustment. Which led to an updated rankings and scores of observed countries in the past five years. • Taking into account data availability, new OECD member states were included among COSTII survey targets (34 countries in 2017, 35countries in 2018, 36countries in 2021). • Assessment indicators were revised to enhance COSTII measurement precision and data interpretation capabilities, with additional supplementary indicators added to provide more illuminating explanations of innovation trends (every year). |
Concept |
• The evaluation of science and technology innovation capacity is comprehensive review of the overall process of innovation (inputs → activities → performance) on the basis of the framework of the NIS. ※ NIS is defined as the sum of all interacting components and their relations, which are involved in the process of creation, dispersion, and utilization of new and economically valuable knowledge of a country (Lundvall, 1992). • It takes a systematic approach that regards active interaction between the elements of process as being a decisive factor of the national science and technology innovation capacity. The evaluation is based on COSTII(COmposite Science and Technology Innovation Index) which is indigenous index in Korea, monitoring the science and technology innovation capacity qualitatively and quantitatively at the national level. |